
Sorry to burst everybody's bubbles on the notion that Britney Spears should lose custody of her kids because of her fired ex-bodyguard claims that she walks around naked in front of the kids is preposterous This "secret witness" for K-Fed's side to get full custody of his children is bull. Now first, let me just say, there are also drug and alcohol allegations. I have a problem with that issue, whether it is true or not. The Judge has ordered BOTH parents to undergo testing twice a week. The Judge is obviously making sure the right thing happens here. Now on to the walking around naked issue.
Wake Up People. Almost ALL parents in the World has at one point or another walked naked in front of their kids. I don't mean to send your little inhibited existence to major therapy sessions but our Mothers and Fathers, respectively, had walked around naked in our house when we were babies and toddlers. Our parents, at one point or another had taken shower or baths with us. There is a certain cut-off age when a Parent thinks each should be more careful about it and teach the kids to knock on the door first.
If you are a parent, once you had a baby, have you ever went into the bathroom to pee, without a baby following you around?
Have you ever taken a shower without feeling the need to not close the bathroom door so your child could walk around in her little walker outside the bathroom?
Have you ever taken a shower, thinking your child is taking a nap, then all of a sudden your hear her/him crying bloody murder from a bad dream so you ran straight to their room, dripping wet and naked?
Have you ever ran naked towards a phone because you didn't want to miss a certain call or it could be a school emergency?
Have you ever found yourself in the middle of an intimate moment with your partner then all of a sudden the baby in the other room start yelling bloody murder so you have no choice but to stop and ran in there naked?
Britney Spear's boys are not even 5 yr olds. I think Kindergarten age is the cut-off age but there will be many many many times when you're trying to put on a bra and then BAMM, the door opens and there's your child wanting attention and asking for food or whatever questions they're curious about at that point of their life.
My husband and I were discussing the ridiculousness of this issue last night and I asked what K-Fed's true motives about this naked defense to get his kids back. Is he really concerned about their safety or is he doing this to get more money out of Britney? She has more money than him. Is he paying child support at all?
Then my husband brought out an even better point. K-Fed wants custody of his boys with Britney to squeeze out more money from her so he could pay child support for his other 2 kids from another woman. Think about it.
If you're still not convinced that almost ALL parents walk naked in front of their kids, read these other articles written by other parents...
I keep saying Almost All parents coz maybe there is 1% of parents out there who don't walk around naked in front of their kids. Frankly, I've never heard of anyone not doing it so. But whatever.
Like I said the other day, if Britney is Fat, then I'm a hippo. Now if Britney loses custody of her kids because she walks around naked in front of them, well guess what, A LOT of parents would be losing their kids too.
Recent Entries:
· Superwoman of the Day: Hungry Girl
· Breast Cancer: Reduce Your Risk
· Women's Health Decodes Your Cravings
Tracee, it's just so ridiculous. It's like Britney has a separate parenting manual compare to the rest of us "normal" folks. I'm not saying she's hasn't done anything shitty these days but overall she's just being nitpicked just coz. No wonder the girl is having a melt down. OI.
EDITORS
Dexie Jane
Lesli Christianson-Kellow
Sonya Procenko
send tips/stories to
contact us
click here.
LANGUAGE
En Français
SYNDICATION
All feeds: click here.
DAILYPIXEL NETWORK
2010Vancouver.ca
Airport.ca
Archive.ca
BallPimp.ca
CityGuide.ca/CALGARY
Canuck.ca
Dailypixel.ca
Dial.ca
Engagements.ca
FluPandemic.ca
Footblog.ca
Forks.ca
Gadget.ca
Gimme.ca
Greetings.ca
Hell.ca
Hugg.ca
CityGuide.ca/KELOWNA
Lease.ca
Meme.ca
Naturopath.ca
PrimeMinister.ca
Profit.ca
RRSPS.ca
SearchEngine.ca
Stare.ca
Stylish.ca
Superwoman.ca
CityGuide.ca/TORONTO
Video.ca
VirtualReality.ca
Wager.ca
TAGS
Tag Cloud
DATE-BASED
October 2009 (2)
September 2009 (1)
July 2009 (2)
June 2009 (1)
May 2009 (2)
April 2009 (1)
March 2009 (2)
February 2009 (4)
January 2009 (4)
December 2008 (4)
November 2008 (29)
October 2008 (38)
September 2008 (58)
August 2008 (53)
July 2008 (81)
June 2008 (39)
May 2008 (43)
April 2008 (39)
March 2008 (24)
February 2008 (9)
January 2008 (21)
December 2007 (24)
November 2007 (27)
October 2007 (31)
September 2007 (24)
August 2007 (22)
July 2007 (27)
June 2007 (44)
May 2007 (36)
April 2007 (41)
March 2007 (23)
SEARCH
1
I know, right? If CPS is taking kids away for appropriate familial nudity: aka being naked in front of babies and toddlers then where exactly are they going to put ALL the kids in the world? Even the foster parents of babies and toddlers find it necessary to be naked in front of them.
They start saying it about Britney and the next thing you know - bamm - it's a new standard applied to all mothers.
From one "morbidly obese" (aka - normal sized) naked mommy to another. Cheers!